← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Saini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 54 11 11 22 0.407 0.0999 0.0999 0.2789 0.2789
2020-21 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 35 17 29 46 1.314 0.3221 0.3312 0.8996 0.9251
2022-23 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 48 24 42 66 1.375 0.3370 0.3293 0.9412 0.9198
2023-24 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 56 44 50 94 1.679 0.4114 0.3807 1.1490 1.0632
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 28 18 10 28 1.000
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA 29 11 11 22 0.759
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2024-25 · Adrian
+146.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
18%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6868
Forward overall
#244
Forward born in 2003
#63
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.