| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Fargo Force | USHL | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.053 | 0.0335 | 0.0324 | 0.1576 | 0.1526 |
| 2012-13 | Austin Bruins | NAHL | 55 | 25 | 40 | 65 | 1.182 | 0.4388 | 0.4186 | 1.2513 | 1.1937 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SR | 42 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.405 |
| 2015-16 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | JR | 22 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.409 |
| 2014-15 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SO | 41 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 0.732 |
| 2013-14 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | FR | 38 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.263 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.