IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emil Romig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-19 Country: Austria
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Indiana Ice USHL 57 10 8 18 0.316 0.2011 0.1950 0.9464 0.9179
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 54 17 37 54 1.000 0.3713 0.3547 1.0588 1.0115
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Denver D1 NCHC SR 36 9 6 15 0.417
2015-16 Denver D1 NCHC JR 36 3 8 11 0.306
2014-15 Denver D1 NCHC SO 31 4 3 7 0.226
2013-14 Denver D1 NCHC FR 32 7 3 10 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2013-14 · Denver
+25.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10365
Forward overall
#449
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Romero
Westfield State · 2008-09
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Campion
Saint Mary's · 2021-22
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Guzzo
Curry · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.