IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Romero Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 19 25 44 0.772 0.2203 0.2194 0.5975 0.5950
2008-09 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 59 14 43 57 0.966 0.2757 0.2584 0.7479 0.7010
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 24 3 15 18 0.750
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 23 4 10 14 0.609
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 24 7 6 13 0.542
2009-10 Westfield State D3 — FR 23 8 16 24 1.044
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.04
2009-10 · Westfield State
+402.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14304
Forward overall
#632
Forward born in 1988
#340
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Beatty
Endicott · 2018-19
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
P.A. Martineau
Hobart · 2016-17
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tory Allan
Norwich · 2008-09
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.