IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Beatty Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 50 12 18 30 0.600 0.1712 0.1711 0.4645 0.4643
2018-19 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 57 11 19 30 0.526 0.1954 0.1904 0.5572 0.5429
2019-20 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 48 7 13 20 0.417 0.1547 0.1547 0.4412 0.4412
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE SR 24 2 5 7 0.292
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE JR 27 8 11 19 0.704
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE SO 26 9 7 16 0.615
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE FR 3 4 0 4 1.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.33
2020-21 · Endicott
+752.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24200
Forward overall
#982
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chase Decker
Norwich · 2002-03
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brody Seitz
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Casale
Salem State · 2013-14
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.