IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Dahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 59 3 6 9 0.152 0.0971 0.0963 0.4570 0.4533
2012-13 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 64 11 13 24 0.375 0.2388 0.2242 1.1238 1.0549
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 37 1 8 9 0.243
2015-16 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2014-15 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 29 5 2 7 0.241
2013-14 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 33 2 8 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2013-14 · St. Lawrence
+104.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22809
Forward overall
#861
Forward born in 1993
#3046
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2009-10
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conor Brown
Amherst · 2011-12
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.