IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conor Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-04-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 50 3 11 14 0.280 0.0799 0.0843 0.2167 0.2287
2010-11 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 61 24 41 65 1.066 0.3041 0.3059 0.8249 0.8297
2011-12 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 59 22 51 73 1.237 0.3531 0.3371 0.9578 0.9143
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 27 4 6 10 0.370
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 26 11 13 24 0.923
2013-14 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 23 11 6 17 0.739
2012-13 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 21 7 11 18 0.857
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2012-13 · Amherst
+208.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12337
Forward overall
#535
Forward born in 1992
#245
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Foster
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Princeton (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Devin Loe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charlie O'Connor
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Fea
Wilkes · 2016-17
1.208 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver De Croock
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Treacy
SUNY Potsdam · 2004-05
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.