IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Oliver De Croock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-19 Country: Belgium
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 42 17 32 49 1.167 0.1570 0.1521 0.3971 0.3847
2019-20 Minnesota Blue Ox USPHL-Premier 44 29 39 68 1.546 0.2080 0.2080 0.5261 0.5261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 27 2 2 4 0.148
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 25 6 6 12 0.480
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 9 4 3 7 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2020-21 · Lawrence
+497.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
32%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21910
Forward overall
#878
Forward born in 1999
#279
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Lepone
Canton · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Schrank
Elmira · 2005-06
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Blake Rielly
SUNY Brockport · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.