← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devon Savignac Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Greater Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Blind River Beavers NOJHL 49 22 13 35 0.714 0.1193 0.1193 0.2974 0.2974
2020-21 Espanola Paper Kings NOJHL 12 6 5 11 0.917 0.1531 0.1531 0.3816 0.3816
2021-22 Kemptville 73's CCHL 49 16 24 40 0.816 0.1771 0.1785 0.6316 0.6366
2022-23 CCHL 49 6 21 27 0.551 0.1195 0.1151 0.4263 0.4105
2023-24 Navan Grads CCHL 51 35 31 66 1.294 0.2807 0.2554 1.0012 0.9109
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC 23 9 7 16 0.696
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2024-25 · Concordia
+307.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15811
Forward overall
#783
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2017-18
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2016-17
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.