IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Paul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 35 8 12 20 0.571 0.0527 0.0518 0.1309 0.1286
2016-17 New England Stars NA3HL 37 25 24 49 1.324 0.1662 0.1532 0.4181 0.3855
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Framingham State D1 MASCAC JR 24 6 4 10 0.417
2019-20 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 24 6 4 10 0.417
2018-19 Framingham State D1 MASCAC SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2017-18 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 19 5 8 13 0.684
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2017-18 · Framingham State
+609.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25361
Forward overall
#1036
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryce Witman
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooks Mitzel
Salem State · 2017-18
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Klein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.