IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 34 7 7 14 0.412 0.1463 0.1491 0.4323 0.4406
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 51 10 7 17 0.333 0.1184 0.1148 0.3499 0.3393
2009-10 — NAHL 50 15 21 36 0.720 0.2557 0.2377 0.7559 0.7026
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA — 27 14 18 32 1.185
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 15 6 21 0.808
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — — 30 6 10 16 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Superior
+230.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26777
Forward overall
#885
Forward born in 1989
#2208
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.