IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Klein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Fargo-Moorhead Jets NAHL 34 7 7 14 0.412 0.1513 0.1542 0.4347 0.4431
2008-09 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 51 10 7 17 0.333 0.1225 0.1188 0.3518 0.3411
2009-10 — NAHL 50 15 21 36 0.720 0.2645 0.2458 0.7600 0.7064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA — 27 14 18 32 1.185
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA — 26 15 6 21 0.808
2011-12 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 19 2 3 5 0.263
2010-11 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC — 30 6 10 16 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2010-11 · Wisconsin-Superior
+219.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26577
Forward overall
#892
Forward born in 1989
#2206
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Hayes
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.