IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Glenn Wiswell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 East Coast Wizards EHL 43 16 11 27 0.628 0.1347 0.1391 0.3075 0.3176
2015-16 East Coast Wizards EHL 41 13 12 25 0.610 0.1309 0.1294 0.2986 0.2953
2016-17 East Coast Wizards EHL 46 22 27 49 1.065 0.2286 0.2157 0.5216 0.4922
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Castleton D3 LittleEast GR 26 7 10 17 0.654
2020-21 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 7 4 2 6 0.857
2019-20 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 25 13 13 26 1.040
2018-19 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 25 7 7 14 0.560
2017-18 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 21 9 5 14 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2017-18 · Castleton
+329.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23457
Forward overall
#980
Forward born in 1996
#292
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Grealish
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Vinny Post
Adrian · 2015-16
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.