← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-02-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 21 4 6 10 0.476 0.0795 0.0803 0.1982 0.2003
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.1072 0.1044 0.3079 0.2999
2017-18 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 44 26 34 60 1.364 0.1784 0.1643 0.4628 0.4262
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 13 0 2 2 0.154
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D1 SUNYAC SO 24 1 6 7 0.292
2019-20 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 24 1 6 7 0.292
2018-19 SUNY Morrisville D1 SUNYAC FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2018-19 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · SUNY Morrisville
+171.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4219
Defenseman overall
#911
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.