IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Ring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3674 0.3954 1.0555 1.1358
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 47 5 8 13 0.277 0.1016 0.1043 0.2920 0.2998
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 36 6 9 15 0.417 0.1531 0.1495 0.4398 0.4295
2013-14 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 12 20 32 0.542 0.1993 0.1846 0.5725 0.5304
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SR 26 6 13 19 0.731
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA JR 25 7 18 25 1.000
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA SO 23 4 7 11 0.478
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 NCHA FR 28 6 16 22 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+438.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31930
Forward overall
#1092
Forward born in 1993
#3005
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Williams
Norwich · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Lay
Lawrence · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.