IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Ring Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 2 1 1 2 1.000 0.3713 0.3996 1.0588 1.1394
2011-12 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 47 5 8 13 0.277 0.1027 0.1055 0.2929 0.3008
2012-13 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 36 6 9 15 0.417 0.1547 0.1511 0.4412 0.4309
2013-14 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 12 20 32 0.542 0.2014 0.1866 0.5743 0.5320
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 26 6 13 19 0.731
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 25 7 18 25 1.000
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 23 4 7 11 0.478
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 28 6 16 22 0.786
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.79
2014-15 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+432.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25322
Forward overall
#981
Forward born in 1993
#2783
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnny Hurd
Tufts · 2021-22
1.087 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joel Wetmore
Utica · 2011-12
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.