| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Flint Jr. Generals | NA3HL | 44 | 29 | 38 | 67 | 1.523 | 0.1940 | 0.1944 | 0.4816 | 0.4825 |
| 2011-12 | Flint Jr. Generals | NA3HL | 45 | 20 | 45 | 65 | 1.444 | 0.1840 | 0.1746 | 0.4569 | 0.4336 |
| 2012-13 | Flint Jr. Generals | NA3HL | 31 | 10 | 31 | 41 | 1.323 | 0.1685 | 0.1515 | 0.4183 | 0.3762 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Lawrence | D3 | NCHA | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.