← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex O'Dowd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Northeast Generals NA3HL 37 3 17 20 0.540 0.0678 0.0654
2017-18 Northeast Generals NA3HL 47 13 31 44 0.936 0.1175 0.1073 0.2956 0.2700
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 24 1 0 1 0.042
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 JR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 4 1 0 1 0.250
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31962
Forward overall
#1508
Forward born in 1997
#1231
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2014-15
0.433 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.