IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Storm Wahlrab Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-02-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 53 10 10 20 0.377 0.1454 0.1403 0.5492 0.5300
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 24 6 9 15 0.625 0.2296 0.2120 0.6597 0.6091
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 30 4 9 13 0.433
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+176.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33354
Forward overall
#1286
Forward born in 1994
#3220
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Ulmer
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Frank Tafelski
Adrian · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.