IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Mohler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 46 20 16 36 0.783 0.2906 0.2813 0.8286 0.8020
2007-08 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 42 19 22 41 0.976 0.3625 0.3330 1.0336 0.9496
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE SR 7 5 3 8 1.143
2010-11 Curry D3 CNE JR 13 4 7 11 0.846
2009-10 Curry D3 — SO 26 14 16 30 1.154
2008-09 Curry D3 — FR 16 3 7 10 0.625
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2008-09 · Curry
+133.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8380
Forward overall
#345
Forward born in 1987
#256
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Doull
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.