IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Verbeke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 46 24 32 56 1.217 0.1467 0.1400 0.3846 0.3671
2013-14 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 47 34 35 69 1.468 0.1769 0.1620 0.4638 0.4247
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 25 15 20 35 1.400
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 26 10 13 23 0.885
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 5 17 22 0.846
2014-15 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 17 3 8 11 0.647
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2014-15 · SUNY Brockport
+393.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25255
Forward overall
#977
Forward born in 1993
#310
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Mason
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brock Krulicki
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.