IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack DesRuisseaux Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tabor NE-Prep 25 8 20 28 1.120 0.2219 0.2219 0.5103 0.5103
2022-23 Tabor NE-Prep 26 18 16 34 1.308 0.2591 0.2591 0.5958 0.5958
2023-24 New Hampshire Mountain Kings NAHL 15 2 4 6 0.400 0.1470 0.1451 0.4222 0.4166
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 40 20 31 51 1.275 0.5198 0.4871 1.0248 0.9604
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 24 2 6 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Wesleyan
+11.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5718
Forward overall
#162
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy Olinyk
St. Norbert · 2012-13
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Frankie DeAugustine
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.