IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frankie DeAugustine Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Indiana Ice USHL 37 2 5 7 0.189 0.1205 0.1194 0.5670 0.5620
2010-11 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 57 21 20 41 0.719 0.2671 0.2615 0.7616 0.7456
2011-12 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 44 16 30 46 1.046 0.3882 0.3609 1.1070 1.0292
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 31 16 23 39 1.258
2014-15 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 22 9 8 17 0.773
2013-14 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 27 11 12 23 0.852
2012-13 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 27 9 16 25 0.926
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2012-13 · UMass Boston
+236.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11321
Forward overall
#449
Forward born in 1991

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Meers
Trine · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cullen Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.