IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Meers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 48 20 29 49 1.021 0.2191 0.2179 0.4999 0.4971
2018-19 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 34 16 38 54 1.588 0.3408 0.3218 0.7777 0.7343
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 4 12 16 0.571
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 28 8 12 20 0.714
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 14 3 7 10 0.714
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 28 6 12 18 0.643
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2019-20 · Trine
+168.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11168
Forward overall
#379
Forward born in 1998
#33
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Couto
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan James
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Vadim Vasjonkin
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.