| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Newmarket Hurricanes | OJHL | 43 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0.581 | 0.1425 | 0.1569 | 0.4003 | 0.4407 |
| 2009-10 | Newmarket Hurricanes | OJHL | 49 | 22 | 27 | 49 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2570 | 0.6885 | 0.7219 |
| 2011-12 | Saginaw Spirit | OHL | 35 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 0.486 | 0.2810 | 0.2648 | 1.2480 | 1.1758 |
| 2012-13 | Pickering Panthers | OJHL | 14 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2225 | 1.9271 | 1.7191 |
| 2013-14 | Univ. of Guelph | USports-M | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.036 | 0.0188 | 0.0200 | 0.1046 | 0.1112 |
| 2014-15 | Univ. of Guelph | USports-M | 25 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 1.040 | 0.5487 | 0.5549 | 3.0482 | 3.0824 |
| 2015-16 | Univ. of Guelph | USports-M | 18 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 1.167 | 0.6156 | 0.5922 | 3.4196 | 3.2895 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Maine | D1 | HockeyEast | SO | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2010-11 | Maine | D1 | HockeyEast | FR | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.