IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carlos Amestoy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 43 10 15 25 0.581 0.1624 0.1788 0.4012 0.4417
2009-10 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 49 22 27 49 1.000 0.2794 0.2930 0.6901 0.7236
2011-12 Saginaw Spirit OHL 35 9 8 17 0.486 0.2899 0.2731 1.2581 1.1854
2012-13 Pickering Panthers OJHL 14 7 7 14 1.000 0.2794 0.2537 1.9426 1.7330
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#11780
Forward overall
#519
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Kneeland
Lake Forest · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.