IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Neil Trimm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-02-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 15 16 31 0.596 0.1702 0.1756 0.4615 0.4760
2001-02 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 15 29 44 0.800 0.2283 0.2249 0.6193 0.6100
2002-03 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 55 22 40 62 1.127 0.3217 0.3021 0.8726 0.8194
2003-04 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 43 55 98 1.815 0.5179 0.4604 1.4048 1.2490
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Neumann D3 — SR 23 15 30 45 1.956
2006-07 Neumann D3 — JR 27 18 49 67 2.482
2005-06 Neumann D3 — SO 25 18 27 45 1.800
2004-05 Neumann D3 — FR 10 10 8 18 1.800
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.80
2004-05 · Neumann
+429.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5745
Forward overall
#232
Forward born in 1983
#41
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Stark
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Hanson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2005-06
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.