IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Perry D'Arrisso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 54 11 25 36 0.667 0.1863 0.1935 0.4601 0.4778
2010-11 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 46 14 42 56 1.217 0.3401 0.3373 0.8401 0.8332
2011-12 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 12 21 33 0.569 0.2113 0.2052 0.6025 0.5850
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 43 18 26 44 1.023 0.3800 0.3499 1.0835 0.9976
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 36 4 6 10 0.278
2015-16 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 34 6 5 11 0.324
2014-15 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 28 0 2 2 0.071
2013-14 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 21 1 2 3 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2013-14 · Clarkson
-42.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9315
Forward overall
#400
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Shade
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.407 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.