IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alain Joanette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.1372 0.1431 0.3722 0.3883
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 21 33 54 1.125 0.3143 0.3113 0.7764 0.7690
2006-07 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 42 20 29 49 1.167 0.3260 0.3065 0.8051 0.7571
2007-08 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 34 14 35 49 1.441 0.4027 0.3605 0.9946 0.8903
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 8 17 25 0.833
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 7 12 19 0.704
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — SO 31 5 15 20 0.645
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 — FR 22 6 9 15 0.682
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2008-09 · St. Norbert
+135.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5442
Forward overall
#236
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
James Willis
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.