← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alain Joanette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 12 13 25 0.481 0.1043 0.1088 0.3720 0.3881
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 21 33 54 1.125 0.2757 0.2731 0.7746 0.7672
2006-07 Bancroft Hawks OJHL 42 20 29 49 1.167 0.2860 0.2689 0.8033 0.7554
2007-08 Peterborough Liftlock Stars OJHL 34 14 35 49 1.441 0.3532 0.3162 0.9923 0.8882
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 30 8 17 25 0.833
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 27 7 12 19 0.704
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 31 5 15 20 0.645
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 22 6 9 15 0.682
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2008-09 · St. Norbert
+167.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8498
Forward overall
#305
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.