← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peter Henderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mason City Toros NA3HL 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.0837 0.0849 0.2105 0.2136
2014-15 Wisconsin Whalers NA3HL 47 31 52 83 1.766 0.2216 0.2141 0.5575 0.5385
2015-16 Wisconsin Whalers NA3HL 44 43 55 98 2.227 0.2795 0.2564 0.7032 0.6450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#6633
Forward overall
#325
Forward born in 1995
#30
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.