IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Menzies Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-03-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2001-02 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 48 1 8 9 0.188 0.0626 0.0666 0.1741 0.1852
2002-03 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 54 3 13 16 0.296 0.0990 0.1007 0.2751 0.2797
2003-04 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 4 12 16 0.276 0.0922 0.0885 0.2561 0.2459
2004-05 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 63 10 43 53 0.841 0.2810 0.2565 0.7810 0.7128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 26 7 13 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+330.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5138
Defenseman overall
#790
Defenseman born in 1984

D1 Comparables

Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gage Christianson
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Glenn Wiswell
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Bancroft
Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.