IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gage Christianson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-01-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.1238 0.1329 0.3529 0.3788
2010-11 Wenatchee Wild NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0531 0.0543 0.1513 0.1547
2011-12 Alaska Avalanche NAHL 59 16 37 53 0.898 0.3335 0.3246 0.9511 0.9257
2012-13 — NAHL 53 18 33 51 0.962 0.3573 0.3298 1.0189 0.9405
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SR 23 15 13 28 1.217
2015-16 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 22 3 19 22 1.000
2014-15 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 20 5 15 20 1.000
2013-14 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 27 6 14 20 0.741
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2013-14 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+164.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7594
Forward overall
#326
Forward born in 1992
#198
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aidan Verbeke
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.