IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Bolden Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 39 13 6 19 0.487 0.1248 0.1277 0.3673 0.3757
2015-16 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 56 35 30 65 1.161 0.2974 0.2896 0.8749 0.8519
2016-17 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 28 15 11 26 0.929 0.2379 0.2198 0.7000 0.6468
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast JR 24 8 7 15 0.625
2019-20 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast — 24 8 7 15 0.625
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D1 HockeyEast SO 26 13 13 26 1.000
2018-19 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast — 26 13 13 26 1.000
2016-17 Elmira D3 UCHC — 10 6 4 10 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2016-17 · Elmira
+419.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18605
Forward overall
#729
Forward born in 1996
#198
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kerfalla Touré
Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Ganz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.