IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Logan Ganz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.0928 0.0960 0.2647 0.2737
2023-24 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 49 10 7 17 0.347 0.1288 0.1270 0.3673 0.3623
2024-25 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 20 25 45 0.763 0.2832 0.2645 0.8075 0.7541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 25 7 14 21 0.840
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2025-26 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+368.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21386
Forward overall
#1043
Forward born in 2004
#2115
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Cole
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Keyes
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Glynn Robitaille
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.