← New Search ↗ Social Card

Glynn Robitaille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 25 7 6 13 0.520 0.1201 0.1182 0.2544 0.2503
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 42 28 28 56 1.333 0.3080 0.2876 0.6524 0.6093
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 18 3 5 8 0.444
2020-21 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC FR 23 7 6 13 0.565
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 23 7 6 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+200.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12225
Forward overall
#552
Forward born in 1998
#151
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.