IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Glynn Robitaille Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 25 7 6 13 0.520 0.1116 0.1098 0.2546 0.2505
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 42 28 28 56 1.333 0.2861 0.2672 0.6529 0.6098
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2021-22 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 18 3 5 8 0.444
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 23 7 6 13 0.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2019-20 · Manhattanville
+223.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18484
Forward overall
#701
Forward born in 1998
#152
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Bevilacqua
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Braedan Cross
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Pisciotta
Endicott · 2014-15
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.