IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braedan Cross Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 15 2 4 6 0.400 0.1557 0.1652 0.5833 0.6188
2015-16 Nipawin Hawks SJHL 20 3 4 7 0.350 0.1011 0.0980 0.2635 0.2555
2016-17 Iroquois Falls Storm NOJHL 54 37 45 82 1.518 0.2560 0.2326 0.6309 0.5731
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 4 0 3 3 0.750
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 15 2 8 10 0.667
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 30 9 7 16 0.533
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 14 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#27752
Forward overall
#1184
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2003-04
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Sherer
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nolan Zotter
Canton · 2023-24
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.