IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Bevilacqua Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-01-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 24 27 51 1.041 0.2908 0.2873 0.7183 0.7098
2007-08 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 49 28 51 79 1.612 0.4504 0.4247 1.1126 1.0490
2008-09 — OJHL 46 32 38 70 1.522 0.4252 0.3791 1.0501 0.9362
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 SUNY Cortland D3 — SR 24 10 10 20 0.833
2012-13 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 24 10 11 21 0.875
2011-12 SUNY Cortland D3 — JR 25 7 15 22 0.880
2010-11 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 St. Norbert D3 — FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#5255
Forward overall
#240
Forward born in 1988
#91
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Bibb
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.