IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harrison Niemann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Omaha Lancers USHL 21 2 3 5 0.238 0.1516 0.1516 0.7135 0.7137
2006-07 — NAHL 46 12 10 22 0.478 0.1776 0.1717 0.5064 0.4895
2007-08 Traverse City North Stars NAHL 48 21 36 57 1.188 0.4409 0.4045 1.2573 1.1535
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SR 25 4 11 15 0.600
2010-11 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — JR 25 5 11 16 0.640
2009-10 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — SO 28 9 9 18 0.643
2008-09 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — FR 8 2 4 6 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2008-09 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+181.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11115
Forward overall
#473
Forward born in 1987

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Fleurent
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.