← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Italiano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 48 12 10 22 0.458 0.1280 0.1409 0.3163 0.3481
2010-11 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 13 14 27 0.551 0.1539 0.1622 0.3802 0.4007
2011-12 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 43 17 25 42 0.977 0.2729 0.2756 0.6740 0.6806
2012-13 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 55 27 29 56 1.018 0.2845 0.2731 0.7027 0.6746
2013-14 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 53 39 30 69 1.302 0.3638 0.3307 0.8984 0.8166
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 26 10 9 19 0.731
2016-17 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 26 12 19 31 1.192
2015-16 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 27 8 14 22 0.815
2014-15 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 25 10 12 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2014-15 · Williams
+234.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9283
Forward overall
#345
Forward born in 1993
#370
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2021-22
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.