← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Italiano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Toronto Patriots OJHL 48 12 10 22 0.458 0.1123 0.1236 0.3155 0.3472
2010-11 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 49 13 14 27 0.551 0.1351 0.1424 0.3794 0.3999
2011-12 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 43 17 25 42 0.977 0.2394 0.2418 0.6725 0.6791
2012-13 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 55 27 29 56 1.018 0.2496 0.2396 0.7010 0.6729
2013-14 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 53 39 30 69 1.302 0.3191 0.2900 0.8964 0.8148
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Williams D3 NESCAC SR 26 10 9 19 0.731
2016-17 Williams D3 NESCAC JR 26 12 19 31 1.192
2015-16 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 27 8 14 22 0.815
2014-15 Williams D3 NESCAC FR 25 10 12 22 0.880
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2014-15 · Williams
+281.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12750
Forward overall
#475
Forward born in 1993
#320
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Endicott · 2017-18
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.