IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Kielich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 45 13 15 28 0.622 0.1525 0.1613 0.4284 0.4532
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 10 17 27 0.551 0.1351 0.1362 0.3794 0.3824
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 52 8 15 23 0.442 0.1084 0.1037 0.3045 0.2914
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 16 21 37 0.685 0.1679 0.1520 0.4718 0.4271
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 26 3 23 26 1.000
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 26 12 19 31 1.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.19
2015-16 · SUNY Brockport
+949.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32751
Forward overall
#1263
Forward born in 1994
#1825
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Davis
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sammy Nardicchio
Trine · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.