IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Kielich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 45 13 15 28 0.622 0.1738 0.1839 0.4294 0.4542
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 10 17 27 0.551 0.1539 0.1551 0.3802 0.3832
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 52 8 15 23 0.442 0.1236 0.1183 0.3052 0.2921
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 16 21 37 0.685 0.1914 0.1733 0.4729 0.4281
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 3 23 26 1.000
2015-16 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 26 12 19 31 1.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.19
2015-16 · SUNY Brockport
+820.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25795
Forward overall
#1044
Forward born in 1994
#2184
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Wieber
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Fletcher
Marian · 2005-06
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.