IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 34 5 10 15 0.441 0.1238 0.1299 0.3628 0.3807
2016-17 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 10 2 2 4 0.400 0.1123 0.1124 0.3289 0.3291
2017-18 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 41 16 11 27 0.658 0.1521 0.1436 0.3222 0.3042
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 20 8 5 13 0.650
2018-19 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 20 8 5 13 0.650
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2018-19 · Southern New Hampshire
+479.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33682
Forward overall
#1585
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Laurent Trépanier
Hobart · 2024-25
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Englebright
Nichols · 2007-08
0.483 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Callum Hofford
Salem State · 2014-15
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.