← New Search ↗ Social Card

Callum Hofford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Coquitlam Express BCHL 53 2 15 17 0.321 0.1195 0.1211 0.4674 0.4735
2013-14 Cornwall Colts CCHL 44 9 20 29 0.659 0.2105 0.2013 0.5102 0.4878
2014-15 Cornwall Colts CCHL 47 5 14 19 0.404 0.1291 0.1175 0.3130 0.2848
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Salem State D1 SR 26 6 13 19 0.731
2019-20 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 26 6 13 19 0.731
2018-19 Salem State D1 JR 28 5 10 15 0.536
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 28 5 10 15 0.536
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 27 7 10 17 0.630
2016-17 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 28 9 12 21 0.750
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.75
2016-17 · Salem State
+425.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10365
Defenseman overall
#1417
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.