IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Baylis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Northern Cyclones EHL 40 11 13 24 0.600 0.1288 0.1203 0.2938 0.2745
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 20 12 7 19 0.950
2016-17 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 20 6 5 11 0.550
2015-16 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SO 15 5 4 9 0.600
2014-15 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 FR 19 6 3 9 0.474
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2014-15 · Southern New Hampshire
+359.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31693
Forward overall
#1241
Forward born in 1993
#708
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Muchalla
Wentworth · 2008-09
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver Lester
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.