← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vinny Muchalla Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 48 4 4 8 0.167 0.0649 0.0725 0.2431 0.2716
2005-06 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 40 8 7 15 0.375 0.1459 0.1557 0.5469 0.5835
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 7 17 24 0.429 0.1668 0.1690 0.6250 0.6333
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 19 4 4 8 0.421 0.1406 0.1352 0.3909 0.3759
2008-09 BCHL 24 9 7 16 0.667 0.2595 0.2381 0.9722 0.8920
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wentworth D3 FR 17 2 5 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2009-10 · Wentworth
+144.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19485
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 1988
#1728
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.