IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vinny Muchalla Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 48 4 4 8 0.167 0.0642 0.0717 0.2426 0.2710
2005-06 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 40 8 7 15 0.375 0.1445 0.1542 0.5457 0.5823
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 56 7 17 24 0.429 0.1651 0.1673 0.6237 0.6320
2007-08 Olds Grizzlys AJHL 19 4 4 8 0.421 0.1412 0.1358 0.3897 0.3748
2008-09 — BCHL 24 9 7 16 0.667 0.2569 0.2357 0.9702 0.8901
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 17 2 5 7 0.412
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2009-10 · Wentworth
+145.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28858
Forward overall
#988
Forward born in 1988
#1572
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Henderson
Marian · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Otis Goldman
Castleton · 2015-16
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.