IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Hansen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Langley Rivermen BCHL 55 9 7 16 0.291 0.1132 0.1154 0.4242 0.4324
2011-12 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 58 12 16 28 0.483 0.1879 0.1812 0.7041 0.6790
2012-13 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 48 22 19 41 0.854 0.3325 0.3049 1.2457 1.1424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 22 6 9 15 0.682
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 28 8 11 19 0.679
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 22 1 1 2 0.091
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 6 1 2 3 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · St. Scholastica
+128.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16020
Forward overall
#679
Forward born in 1992
#1385
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Anders Grongstad
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.