IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Evans Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 26 22 48 1.000 0.2451 0.2450 0.6885 0.6882
2009-10 — OJHL 40 19 11 30 0.750 0.1838 0.1741 0.5164 0.4891
2010-11 — OJHL 49 30 29 59 1.204 0.2951 0.2658 0.8290 0.7465
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 24 8 21 29 1.208
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC — 20 12 7 19 0.950
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.95
2011-12 · Westfield State
+384.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15751
Forward overall
#625
Forward born in 1990
#517
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Monreal
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Kemp
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.