← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anders Grongstad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 27 11 14 25 0.926 0.1211 0.1211 0.3143 0.3143
2021-22 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 43 27 34 61 1.419 0.1856 0.1727 0.4815 0.4480
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 25 8 10 18 0.720
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 24 9 5 14 0.583
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 26 5 16 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2022-23 · Worcester State
+446.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9224
Forward overall
#402
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.