IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anders Grongstad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 27 11 14 25 0.926 0.1246 0.1246 0.3152 0.3152
2021-22 Metro Jets USPHL-Premier 43 27 34 61 1.419 0.1909 0.1776 0.4829 0.4493
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 25 8 10 18 0.720
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 24 9 5 14 0.583
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 26 5 16 21 0.808
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.81
2022-23 · Worcester State
+431.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25412
Forward overall
#978
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erick Ware
SUNY Potsdam · 2010-11
0.809 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Louis DiMatteo
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Erwin
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.