← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesper Seeberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 40 16 23 39 0.975 0.1100 0.1100 0.3310 0.3310
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 36 5 5 10 0.278 0.0642 0.0666 0.2239 0.2322
2022-23 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 20 16 12 28 1.400 0.1579 0.1548 0.4753 0.4660
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 33 14 17 31 0.939 0.1060 0.0988 0.3189 0.2973
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 20 7 7 14 0.700
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC 23 3 8 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Westfield State
+361.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12264
Forward overall
#562
Forward born in 2003
#625
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2018-19
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.