IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kade Brannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 39 4 4 8 0.205 0.0189 0.0185 0.0470 0.0460
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 39 16 13 29 0.744 0.0686 0.0640 0.1703 0.1589
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D1 MIAC SR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC JR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#48660
Forward overall
#2117
Forward born in 1995
#663
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Niestrom
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jivan Sidhu
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jasper Korican-Barlay
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.