IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kade Brannon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 39 4 4 8 0.205 0.0246 0.0241 0.0471 0.0461
2015-16 Florida Eels USPHL-Elite 39 16 13 29 0.744 0.0892 0.0832 0.1707 0.1592
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 18 1 1 2 0.111
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 20 2 5 7 0.350
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#48271
Forward overall
#2116
Forward born in 1995
#674
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Niestrom
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Ballagh
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jasper Korican-Barlay
Fredonia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.