IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jasper Korican-Barlay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 42 18 38 56 1.333 0.1599 0.1573 0.3061 0.3012
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 5 10 15 0.395 0.1185 0.1129 0.3251 0.3098
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D3 — JR 25 6 15 21 0.840
2018-19 Fredonia D3 — SO 27 1 7 8 0.296
2017-18 Fredonia D3 — FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#30365
Forward overall
#1318
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Schell
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Seth Reda
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Brown
Saint John's · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.