IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jasper Korican-Barlay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 42 18 38 56 1.333 0.1231 0.1211 0.3053 0.3004
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 38 5 10 15 0.395 0.1108 0.1056 0.3245 0.3093
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC JR 25 6 15 21 0.840
2019-20 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC JR 25 6 15 21 0.840
2018-19 Fredonia D1 SUNYAC SO 27 1 7 8 0.296
2018-19 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC SO 27 1 7 8 0.296
2017-18 Fredonia D3 SUNYAC FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#34773
Forward overall
#1488
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devon Schell
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Shane
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Seth Reda
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.