IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Seth Reda Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 52 10 27 37 0.712 0.2642 0.2559 0.7533 0.7295
2004-05 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 54 17 28 45 0.833 0.3094 0.2842 0.8823 0.8105
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 30 9 17 26 0.867
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 27 3 3 6 0.222
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 26 6 9 15 0.577
2005-06 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 27 5 5 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2005-06 · Wisconsin-Superior
+58.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11160
Forward overall
#387
Forward born in 1984
#566
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.