IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Davis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 43 10 13 23 0.535 0.1900 0.1970 0.5616 0.5823
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 59 28 31 59 1.000 0.3552 0.3505 1.0499 1.0359
2013-14 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 28 35 63 1.050 0.3730 0.3493 1.1024 1.0325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 13 5 18 0.692
2016-17 Stevenson D3 MAC — 26 11 14 25 0.962
2015-16 Neumann D3 MAC — 27 20 13 33 1.222
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC — 26 13 7 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2014-15 · Neumann
+156.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10796
Forward overall
#399
Forward born in 1993
#292
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Domsodi
Wentworth · 2010-11
1.250 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.