← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keenan Hodgson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-04-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Collingwood Blues OJHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2451 0.2830 0.6885 0.7951
2009-10 Collingwood Blues OJHL 56 7 16 23 0.411 0.1007 0.1110 0.2828 0.3117
2010-11 Nepean Raiders CCHL 60 6 17 23 0.383 0.0831 0.0880 0.2966 0.3139
2011-12 Nepean Raiders CCHL 54 18 16 34 0.630 0.1366 0.1376 0.4871 0.4906
2012-13 Nepean Raiders CCHL 42 13 20 33 0.786 0.1704 0.1641 0.6079 0.5854
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 58 20 34 54 0.931 0.2019 0.1844 0.7203 0.6578
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Amherst D3 NESCAC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Amherst D3 NESCAC 9 3 7 10 1.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.11
2014-15 · Amherst
+636.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20182
Forward overall
#697
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alvernia · 2024-25
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.