| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Collingwood Blues | OJHL | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1.000 | 0.2451 | 0.2830 | 0.6885 | 0.7951 |
| 2009-10 | Collingwood Blues | OJHL | 56 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 0.411 | 0.1007 | 0.1110 | 0.2828 | 0.3117 |
| 2010-11 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 60 | 6 | 17 | 23 | 0.383 | 0.0831 | 0.0880 | 0.2966 | 0.3139 |
| 2011-12 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 54 | 18 | 16 | 34 | 0.630 | 0.1366 | 0.1376 | 0.4871 | 0.4906 |
| 2012-13 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 42 | 13 | 20 | 33 | 0.786 | 0.1704 | 0.1641 | 0.6079 | 0.5854 |
| 2013-14 | Nepean Raiders | CCHL | 58 | 20 | 34 | 54 | 0.931 | 0.2019 | 0.1844 | 0.7203 | 0.6578 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2014-15 | Amherst | D3 | NESCAC | — | 9 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 1.111 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.